
Five Prompts That Fix Most Bad AI Answers

Your Meetings Are Full of Blog Posts

It Worked on Day One. Check Day Fifteen.
Here’s the uncomfortable truth about automation that nobody selling it leads with: the tool you build today works great on day one. Then, on day fifteen, a couple of its data sources quietly aren’t pulling the same depth of data they were before, and nothing looks obviously broken.
I build daily intelligence tools that read data from the public web and turn it into decisions for business owners. I love these systems. And I will tell you plainly: they cannot just run forever, because the websites they read from change constantly. A field gets renamed. A page gets reorganized. Terms and conditions get updated. A source that was rich last month gets thin. None of that announces itself. Your tool keeps running, keeps delivering something, and the something slowly gets worse.
The fix is a system that watches the system
The answer isn’t checking everything by hand every morning; that would erase the time the automation saved. The answer is building the audit in. Behind every tool I run for a client sits a self-auditing layer that reviews each run: did every source connect, did the data arrive at expected depth, did anything shift. When a flag goes up, I go in and repair the connection so the data stays clean. And the audit works the hopeful direction too: part of maintenance is watching for new sources worth adding, because useful data launches as often as it disappears.
That’s the real shape of running automation seriously: build once, then tend it like the living thing it is.
The question to ask any vendor, including me
If someone sells you an automated tool, whether that’s me or anyone else, ask one question: who checks it on day fifteen? What happens when a source changes? If the answer is a blank look, you’re buying a tool that will quietly rot while still sending you output. If the answer is a monitoring plan, fixes included, and an honest explanation of why ongoing service costs money, you’re buying something built by a person who has actually run these systems past their first two weeks.
The magic of automation is real. The maintenance is just as real. Anyone who only mentions the first half is selling, not building.
- Assume every web data source your tool touches will change. It will.
- Build or demand a self-audit: every run checked for connections, depth, and drift.
- Flags get fixed by a human, promptly. Silence is not health.
- Review for new sources worth adding, not just broken ones.
- Before buying any automated tool, ask: who checks it on day fifteen?
This post came out of a real conversation at the AI Essentials Roundtable, the small group I run for business owners who want to actually use AI instead of just reading about it. We meet every other week, screen-share real builds, and steal each other’s wins. If that sounds useful, details are here: tablelandpartners.com/ai_essentials_roundtable


